This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

VAT Tribunal Says Adviser’s Unauthorised Option To Tax Was Not Invalidly Made

Shared from Tax Insider: VAT Tribunal Says Adviser’s Unauthorised Option To Tax Was Not Invalidly Made
By Andrew Needham, November 2006

This case illustrates the disasters that can still occur when the option to tax position for a building is not fully considered.

 

The Appellant purchased a non-opted tenanted commercial property with the intention of obtaining planning permission for residential conversion. The Appellant's advisers submitted a VAT 1 and VAT 1614 option notification, both signed by the Appellant (the decision suggests a number of reasons why it may have been thought necessary to apply for VAT registration and opt). The Appellant subsequently completed a questionnaire, and answered telephone questions on the application from HMRC. However, the major tenant was a charity whose lease provided that, if the landlord opted to tax, the rent would be deemed VAT-inclusive. When it came to invoicing for rents, the significance of the option was brought into focus, and the Appellant instructed the managing agents not to charge VAT.

 

The Appellant argued to HMRC that the option notification was invalid on the basis that the adviser did not have authority to lodge it (or at least not at the time it was lodged) and that the Appellant had not intended an option to take effect as evidenced by its subsequent actions. HMRC rejected this argument.

 

The Tribunal held that, notwithstanding the clear misunderstandings, the two actions necessary for a valid option - the act of opting and the notification of it - were present at the time on the part of the Appellant, who could not 'hide behind' his advisers.  The appeal was thus dismissed. 

This case illustrates the disasters that can still occur when the option to tax position for a building is not fully considered.

 

The Appellant purchased a non-opted tenanted commercial property with the intention of obtaining planning permission for residential conversion. The Appellant's advisers submitted a VAT 1 and VAT 1614 option notification, both signed by the Appellant (the decision suggests a number of reasons why it may have been thought necessary to apply for VAT registration and opt). The Appellant subsequently completed a questionnaire, and answered telephone questions on the application from HMRC. However, the major tenant was a charity whose lease provided that, if the landlord opted to tax, the rent would be deemed VAT-inclusive. When it came to invoicing for rents, the significance of the option was brought into focus, and the Appellant instructed the managing agents not to charge VAT.

 

The Appellant argued

... Shared from Tax Insider: VAT Tribunal Says Adviser’s Unauthorised Option To Tax Was Not Invalidly Made
(TI) Begin your tax saving journey today

Each month our tax experts reveal FREE tax strategies to help minimise your taxes.

To get Tax Insider tips and updates delivered to your inbox every month simply enter your name and email address below: