This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Private residence relief: Property was not occupied as a residence

Shared from Tax Insider: Private residence relief: Property was not occupied as a residence
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2020

The appellant lived in a property (WH) in London. In February 1994, the appellant purchased another property in London (HM) for £175,000. Once purchased, the appellant carried out extensive renovation works to HM, which lasted until February 1995. From 1995 until early August 2013, the appellant let HM to tenants.  

In February 2014, the appellant sold the property for a substantial gain. In her self-assessment return for the tax year 2013/14, the appellant claimed that the amount of the gain chargeable to CGT was reduced by principal private residence (PPR) relief (under TCGA 1992, ss 222 and 223), on the basis that HM was her main residence for the last six months of her ownership (i.e. 14 August 2013 to 23 February 2014). However, HMRC refused the PPR relief claim. The appellant appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that the appellant had not proved, on the balance of probabilities, that she occupied HM as a residence

This is one of our 3517 Premium articles

To see this article in full and unlock access to our complete library of 3517 articles click 'subscribe & unlock' below:
SUBSCRIBE & UNLOCK

Subscriptions include a 14 day free trial
+ money back satisfaction guarantee

101 Practical Tax Tips eBook
Download this month's
101 Practical Tax Tips eBook